I realize that sometimes I am boring, with Veltroni, as far as I say and do is clearly not on the list of top ten problems each of us. But this time I think it is worth to insist, at least here. It also has to do with what was said Monday, the need to give precise targets, even small, but achievable. Here, tonight I could write about many things (Libya, the school, the crisis) without being able to change any. Or I might insist on Veltroni, because maybe you can do here tonight concrete steps to resize it. Exactly, Veltroni is now within my reach. It does not mean that I have become important, huh, sure. It simply means that Veltroni is becoming smaller, and that his outlandish statements are beginning to get lost in background noise (which I would then, hello, my name is Leonardo and produce noise).
the rest, judge for yourself. Sunday Veltroni called the peaceful people in the streets. He decided to do it through facebook, which I believe is a suicidal move, a fairly blatant demonstration of ignorance of the dynamics of Internet users - No one expects that the rest of the WV knows for sure who has better things to do and learn what are tags like - but there should be someone who can advise? It is not the representative of an important current of the PD? It is not known. Whatever the reason, the appeal is still there. has collected hundreds of comments, and not all insulting, as I wrote Monday. God forbid, the world is beautiful because it is diverse. But we want to talk about "like", or whatever they're called in Italian the "like"? Veltroni's piece, published on Sunday morning, like 132 persons per hour. Are they many? I do not seem so. I seem to almost 132 stones on the grave of the charisma of a leader. I exaggerate? A prominent politician is uncertain because the squares are not filled for la pace, o contro Gheddafi (come se fosse la stessa cosa manifestare per la pace e contro Gheddafi), e il suo accorato invito alla mobilitazione... piace a 132 persone . Così, a occhio non ci riempi una piazza. D'altro canto è solo un numero, e i numeri da soli non dicono molto.
Ma è sufficiente accostarli ad altri numeri: per esempio io (che non sono nessuno), lunedì mattina ho pubblicato sull'Unita.it un pezzo in cui rispondevo a Veltroni. Mi è venuto magari un po' pedestre, va bene, chiedo scusa, in ogni caso la mia risposta a Veltroni piace per ora a 113 persone. Sono molte? Sono poche? Per i numeri che faccio di solito io su facebook, sono parecchie. In termini assoluti is very small. But if we compare with the figure of Veltroni ... Think about it, is a former secretary of the Democratic Party, one that is still in the headlines with his declarations ( yesterday gave an interview in Il Sole 24 Ore , rambling as usual, where he continues to wonder why the pacifists do not support the guerrillas . Veltroni, in short, those who demonstrated against the war in Iraq were pacifists and those who march on Tripoli guerrillas. Is it really so hard to tell the difference?) Here, a personality like calls to arms for peace facebook, and gets like 132. A nerd's answer, and it gets 113. And with a little 'stress I think that 113 may anche superare il 132. Esatto, sì, vi sto chiedendo di votare per me su Facebook. Lo so che è imbarazzante, ma credo che potrebbe avere un pur minuscolo significato mediatico. Come minimo, sarebbe la dimostrazione che è meglio non usarlo, Facebook, se sei Walter Veltroni e vuoi chiamare il tuo popolo alle barricate. Non è l'ambiente adatto. Lo so che fuori c'è un mondo che non saprà mai chi sono io e conosce e stima WV. Lo so, Facebook non è assolutamente rappresentativo di nessun bacino elettorale. Però un flop su Facebook è pur sempre un flop. Il ridimensionamento di un personaggio che non sta facendo bene al PD passa anche attraverso momenti come questi: lui prova una sortita, rimedia pernacchie, la prossima time be more careful.
is something that has already happened in the past, for example, Francesco Rutelli. Do you remember, Rutelli? Remember that at some point you even come to regard the thought of voting for him? For her figure long dominated the political debate: his choice of field prodiana, his centrist skids, filled the front pages. Then something happened. Slowly, long before it disappeared from the scene, Rutelli stopped being interesting. What happened? It was not understood, but no one ever take away from the head that was because of the Winx, the popular dolls. That is, at some point someone published a survey of center-left leader (Rutelli era evidentemente tra i candidati), qualche buontempone tra i leader inserì le Winx, che non sbancarono, ma guadagnarono un dignitoso uno o due per cento, attestandosi – questo è importante – molto al di sopra del dato di Francesco Rutelli. A quel punto forse anche ai vertici capirono. Continuarono a candidarlo, perché l'autolesionismo a sinistra è un dato oggettivo: riuscirono persino a perdere il municipio di Roma: però ormai era andata, dopo il confronto con le Winx Rutelli non è più stato lo stesso. Era già antipatico più o meno a tutti, ma tutti davano per scontato che fosse il candidato adatto a qualcun altro. I comunisti pensavano ai cattolici, i cattolici pensavano ai radicali, radicals thought mboh, there we are going badly taken off. The Winx freed us from the spell, thanks Winx. Rutelli And then it is even out of the PD, and you know what had been lost in the polls when the Democratic Party Rutelli came out with all his teodem? Nothing, indeed, gained a bit '. Thanks Winx.
Well, maybe chance, or fate, or the plot plutomassogiudaicofacebookiano, gave me the opportunity to be the Winx Walter Veltroni. I think it is my duty to play my role until the end. I'm nobody, I'm a character on useless writing long pieces and serious. But maybe I'm on facebook more popular than Walter Veltroni. So, dear journalists, of course I do not pretend to take seriously. Ma la piantiamo piuttosto di prendere sul serio Walter Veltroni?
0 comments:
Post a Comment